| ||||||||||||
|
|
(December 2000) For techies and other skilled professionals from abroad, the H-1B visa is often viewed as the ticket to a job in the US. With the recent decision to increase the cap on H-1B visas from 115,000 to 195,000 per year, programmers, engineers and others from around the world may have an easier time finding jobs in the US.
Since then, high tech firms have argued for another increase in H-1Bs to meet the need for programmers, network engineers and other technology professionals. These companies got their wish in October when President Clinton signed the American Competitiveness in the 21st Century Act. The highlights of the law include:
Those favoring the increase in the H-1B cap argued that it was needed because of a shortage of high tech workers in the US. A workforce study from Information Technology Association of America (ITAA) released earlier this year, found a 12-month demand for 1.6 million information technology workers in the US. According to the ITAA, "because many applicants lack the requisite skill sets, hiring managers polled in the survey estimate that approximately half of these jobs will go unfilled." But others contended the shortage was more of a mirage. In the Washington Post, dueling editorials addressed the issue. Thomas J. Engibous, CEO of Texas Instruments, and Edward B. Rust Jr., CEO of State Farm Insurance, argued for an increase in the number of H-1Bs, saying American companies want to recruit the best professionals they can find. "There is no reason," they wrote, "why we have to choose between hiring the most qualified employees now for our immediate needs and supporting long-term excellence in our schools and our workforce. We can do both." In a subsequent op-ed piece, Norman Matloff, a professor of computer science at the University of California, Davis, contended that cheap labor was the real motivating factor for increasing the cap on H-1Bs. "Employers are importing H-1Bs at low salaries to do the programming, while shunting many Americans into lesser jobs such as customer support," he wrote. Though President Clinton signed the legislation, he had reservations, too. In a statement issued on Oct. 17, President Clinton expressed concern with some aspects of the act. "One of the key requirements of the H-1B program is that the foreign worker is paid the same wage as US workers doing the same job," he said. "This legislation, however, by allowing H-1B workers to change employers before a new employer's application has been approved, could result in an employer -- knowingly or unknowingly -- not paying the prevailing wage." President Clinton directed the INS to monitor those provisions and determine whether the next Congress should consider changes to the H-1B program. In other words, with the H-1B, nothing is ever settled. Material from the immigration law firm of Siskind, Susser, Haas & Devine was used in this report. This information is provided as a public service and not intended as legal advice or the establishment of an attorney-client relationship. |
||||||||||
| ||||||||||||